Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> +     default:
>>> +             return;
>>> +     }
>>> +     for (; first <= last; first++)
>> This looks odd.  If you use the usual last+1 convention between the
>> caller and callee, you do not have to do this, or call this function
>> with "i - 1" and "list->nr -1" as the last parameter.
> I know. I just don't know how to name the variable to say "the element
> after the last one".

In case it was unclear, by the "usual last+1 convention", I meant
that it is perfectly normal to write

        for (i = first; i < last; i++)
        for (i = begin; i < end; i++)

in C.  Saying these as

        for (i = first; i < beyond_last; i++)
        for (i = begin; i < beyond_end; i++)

look non-C.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to