On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> > I think it might be worth just eliminating the whole idea.
> I kinda like the simplification ;-) An even thinner wrapper that
> calls malloc() and dies if it gets NULL, without any "try-to-free"
> logic.

This is one of those instances where I wish we would have some reliable
data rather than having to guess whether it is a good idea or not.


Reply via email to