Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:04 PM SZEDER Gábor <szeder....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To avoid data loss, 'git worktree remove' refuses to delete a worktree
>> if it's dirty or contains untracked files.  However, the error message
>> only mentions that the worktree "is dirty", even if the worktree in
>> question is in fact clean, but contains untracked files:
>> [...]
>> Clarify this error message to say that the worktree "contains modified
>> or untracked files".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder....@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
>> @@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static void check_clean_worktree(struct worktree *wt,
>>         ret = xread(cp.out, buf, sizeof(buf));
>>         if (ret)
>> -               die(_("'%s' is dirty, use --force to delete it"),
>> +               die(_("'%s' contains modified or untracked files, use 
>> --force to delete it"),
>>                     original_path);
>
> Makes sense. This is a different type of "dirtiness" than, say, "git
> rebase --interactive" which cares about unstaged changes but generally
> doesn't mind untracked files. So, it deserves an error message which
> mentions untracked files explicitly.
>
> We could actually parse the output of "git status --porcelain" (which
> is invoked just above this spot) and provide a more specific error
> message ("...contains modified files" or "...contains untracked
> files") but that's probably not worth the effort.
>
> Anyhow, for what it's worth:
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com>

Thanks, both.

Reply via email to