Paul Campbell wrote:
> Here's the updated version of the tests:
Just a few more nits:
> --- a/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh
> +++ b/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh
> @@ -465,4 +465,37 @@ test_expect_success 'verify one file change per commit' '
[...]
> +test_expect_success 'change in subtree is pushed okay' '
> + (cd copy0 && create new_file && git commit -m"Added new_file") &&
Style: this would be easier to read with each command on a separate
line, like so:
(
cd copy0 &&
create new_file &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "Add new_file"
) &&
[...]
> +test_expect_success 'pull into subtree okay' '
> + git subtree add --prefix=copy1 sub1 &&
> + git subtree add --prefix=copy2 sub1 &&
> + (cd copy1 && create new_file_in_copy1 && git commit -m"Added
> new_file_in_copy1") &&
Likewise (and as a nice side-benefit, it would avoid a long line that
mailers like to wrap).
> + git subtree push --prefix=copy1 &&
> + git subtree pull --prefix=copy2 | grep "^ create mode 100644
> copy2/new_file_in_copy1$"
Likewise. More importantly, this forgets the exit status from "git
subtree pull", so if it were to segfault after writing appropriate
output, the test wouldn't notice. How about:
git subtree pull --prefix=copy2 >output &&
grep "^ create mode 100644 copy2/new_file_in_copy1\$" output
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
