On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:27:50AM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:56:07AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I've taken the following to 'maint'…
> Should I rebase v4 onto maint so I don't accidentally collide with any
> of the previous patches which have already been merged there?

I tried this, but the backtick patch shouldn't move to maint due to:

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:36:32PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> I based my changes on `master` to avoid colliding with 2de9b711
> (Documentation: the name of the system is 'Git', not 'git',
> 2013-01-21), but if you shifted them already I suppose you've fixed
> any conflicts ;).

I'll drop it for now, and revive it after the next release syncs
master and maint.  I've rebased the remaining patches onto `maint`.

This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to