On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 04:33:31PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 01:25:35PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> > 
> > > But it's easy to do (1), and it starts the clock ticking for
> > > the 1000-byte readers to become obsolete.
> > 
> > Yup, I agree with that goal.
> Having just looked at the pkt-line callers a lot, I think most of them
> could go for something like:
> [...]
> That would actually simplify the callers a bit, and would harmonize the
> buffer sizes at the same time. I'll look into doing a series tonight.

Just a quick update on this series. It ended up taking more nights than
I thought. :) The result looks much better than what I posted before, and
I found several other corner cases and bugs in packet parsing, too.

I'm going to hold off on posting it tonight, as I'm now up to 19
patches, and after several rounds of "rebase -i", I need to give it a
final read-through myself before inflicting it on anyone else. I'll do
that and post it tomorrow.

In the meantime, please hold off on what I've posted so far (that
includes the jk/smart-http-robustify topic).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to