Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com> writes: >> * en/merge-recursive-directory-rename-fixes (2019-10-12) 2 commits >> (merged to 'next' on 2019-10-15 at ebfdc3ff7b) >> + merge-recursive: fix merging a subdirectory into the root directory >> + merge-recursive: clean up get_renamed_dir_portion() >> >> A few glitches in the heuristic in merge-recursive to infer file >> movements based on movements of other files in the same directory >> have been corrected. >> >> Will merge to 'master'. > > I'm surprised this one was merged straight down to next; perhaps I > should have highlighted my plans a bit clearer in the thread?
My mistake. I am willing to revert the merge to give the topic a clean slate. Just tell me so. Thanks. > Also, a very minor point but "glitches" may be misleading; it suggests > (to me at least) a malfunction rather than a failure to trigger,... I used the word to mean a failure to trigger (after all, a heuristic that fails to trigger when most people would naturelly expect it to is showing a glitch in that case). A better phrasing, please?
