On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 11:27 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Carlos Martín Nieto <c...@elego.de> writes:
> > On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:31 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > ...
> >> Interesting.  "git ls-remote . | grep 1.8.0-" for maint, master,
> >> next and pu produce identical results for me, all showing peeled
> >> ones correctly.
> >
> > Bisection leads me to Peff's 435c8332 (2012-10-04; upload-pack: use
> > peel_ref for ref advertisements) and reverting that commit brings the
> > -rc3^{} back.
> A shot in the dark, as I do not seem to be able to reproduce the issue
> with anything that contains the commit.  Perhaps your .git/packed-refs
> is corrupt?

My packed-refs file did not end with LF. It seems it must or the parser
won't consider the last tag in the file to have a peeled target and mine
didn't. I don't how the ended up this way but it looks like there's is a
bug in the parser (or does the format force you to have LF at the end?)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to