On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Thomas Rast <[email protected]> wrote:
> Before 82dce99 (attr: more matching optimizations from .gitignore,
> 2012-10-15), .gitattributes did not have any special treatment of a
> leading '!'. The docs, however, always said
>
> The rules how the pattern matches paths are the same as in
> `.gitignore` files; see linkgit:gitignore[5].
>
> By those rules, leading '!' means pattern negation. So 82dce99
> correctly determined that this kind of line makes no sense and should
> be disallowed.
>
> However, users who actually had a rule for files starting with a '!'
> are in a bad position: before 82dce99 '!' matched that literal
> character, so it is conceivable that users have .gitattributes with
> such lines in them. After 82dce99 the unescaped version was
> disallowed in such a way that git outright refuses to run(!) most
> commands in the presence of such a .gitattributes. It therefore
> becomes very hard to fix, let alone work with, such repositories.
>
> Let's at least allow the users to fix their repos: change the fatal
> error into a warning.
I agree we should not break existing .gitattributes. So yes, die()ing
here sounds bad. But..
> @@ -255,9 +255,11 @@ static struct match_attr *parse_attr_line(const char
> *line, const char *src,
> &res->u.pat.patternlen,
> &res->u.pat.flags,
> &res->u.pat.nowildcardlen);
> - if (res->u.pat.flags & EXC_FLAG_NEGATIVE)
> - die(_("Negative patterns are forbidden in git
> attributes\n"
> - "Use '\\!' for literal leading exclamation."));
> + if (res->u.pat.flags & EXC_FLAG_NEGATIVE) {
> + warning(_("Negative patterns are ignored in git
> attributes\n"
> + "Use '\\!' for literal leading
> exclamation."));
> + return NULL;
> + }
This "return NULL;" means we ignore "!blah" pattern, which is a
regression, isn't it? Should we treat '!' as literal here?
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
