Jeff King <> writes:

> I think this is OK, and I do not mind if it gets applied. But what I was
> hinting at in my earlier mail was that we might want to do this (I have
> it as a separate patch on top of your 3/6 here, but it would make more
> sense squashed in):

I would prefer to see a preparatory patch to teach mk_test/mk_empty
to _always_ take the new name (i.e. the result of your patch) and
then do whatever new things on top.

By the way, I am planning to _not_ look at new stuff today. I'd
rather see known recent regressions addressed (and unknown ones
discovered and squashed) before we move forward, and I would
appreciate if regular contributors did the same.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to