Jeff King <> writes:

> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:38:12PM -0500, Jed Brown wrote:
>>   $ git branch --no-merged master --merged next
> Yeah, sadly that does not work, as we use the same slot for the flag and
> store only one of the two (and we also allow only one "--merged" head,
> even though you could in theory want to know "merged to X, or merged to
> Y").

Hmm, I would have said conjunction (AND) was more natural than
disjunction (OR). If we add support for multiple '--merged' and
'--no-merged', do we expect to eventually have a full query grammar?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to