On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
> This feels weirdly specific, and like we should just be tuning our hash
> table growth better. You show a 3.2% speedup here. I was able to get a
> 2.8% speedup just by doing this:

It also uses a lot more memory. 5.8m entries for ".. * 2" and 8.8m for
"... * 3". Probably no big deal for modern machines..

> It might be worth trying to figure out what the optimium growth rate is
> first, which would help this use case and others. With less fragile
> code.

Agreed. Although I think it's getting out of my domain. I'm not even
sure how many factors are involved.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to