Le lundi 01 avril 2013 à 12:57 -0700, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> The user could have said "git merge $(git rev-parse v1.0.0)"; we
> shouldn't mark it as "Merge commit '15999998fb...'" as the merge
> name, even though such an invocation might be crazy.
> We could even read the "tag " header from the tag object and replace
> the object name the user gave us, but let's not lose the information
> by doing so, at least not yet.
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>

Thanks for the patch.

I gave it a try and found the behavior rather good.

Merging a tag object by its name or by its object-id are now using the
same behavor: it is more consistent. 

Tested-by: Yann Droneaud <ydrone...@opteya.com>

PS: there's a typo in the commit title :)


Yann Droneaud

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to