On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Ideally we shouldn't do this, as it's not recommended in mercurial
>> documentation, but there's no other way to push multiple bookmarks (on
>> the same branch), which would be the behavior most similar to git.
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
>> ---
> In the previous round you wanted me to exclude this one to force
> split head at the remote, and I saw you and Max Horn discussing
> (rather, shouting at each other ;-) why it is needed/desirable.

No, that was "don't update bookmarks unnecessarily", and it seems you
skipped it appropriately.

> Have you changed your mind and you want this as part of the series,
> or is it just you forgot to exclude it?

Nope, I still see no reason not to push this.

Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to