Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:

> For now I left the sleeps in t3210.  Given that the problem will be
> solved by topic jc/prune-all, building a fancier workaround into this
> test for the old broken --expire behavior seems like a waste of time.
> I propose that the sleeps be removed when this patch series is merged
> with jc/prune-all.

I wouldn't mind to queue this on top of the "prune --expire=all" topic
at all, especially if that makes the tests easier.

Overall looks very cleanly done (I only let my eyes coast over them,
and need another round to read it over).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to