Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> Normally one would break if unsuccessful. What would fail if this was
> replaced by "do_next || break" and the above ".. && return 1" was "..
> && return". I assume that was your first attempt, but why did it not
> work?

Thanks.  This was a major thinko on my part, but I don't remember
exactly why I got confused.  I'll explain this patch properly in the
next iteration.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to