On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This script find people that might be interested in a patch, by going
>>> back through the history for each single hunk modified, and finding
>>> people that reviewed, acknowledge, signed, or authored the code the
>>> patch is modifying.
>>> It does this by running 'git blame' incrementally on each hunk, and then
>>> parsing the commit message. After gathering all the relevant people, it
>>> groups them to show what exactly was their role when the participated in
>>> the development of the relevant commit, and on how many relevant commits
>>> they participated. They are only displayed if they pass a minimum
>>> threshold of participation.
>> Is this patch still not understandable?
> Among the people who review patches here and give usable feedback,
> earlier this week Peff said he is away from his mailbox for the rest
> of the week, and I am not reviewing any new topics that are not in
> 'next', being busy in preparation for -rc0, so I wouldn't be able to
> answer that question.
> I do not know about the others, but it is understandable from time
> to time there is a period a series is not being reviewed by anybody.
That's fine, I was mostly asking Ramkumar who earlier argued earlier
versions of this patch were not understandable.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html