On 13-05-01 06:31 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On 1 May 2013 11:12, Eric Sunshine <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Felipe Contreras
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> So HEAD@{0}~0^0 is too much to type, but we can remove '^0', and we can
>>> remove '~0', and we can remove 'HEAD', which leaves us with @{0}, but we
>>> can't remove '{0}'?
>>>
>>> This patch allows '@' to be the same as 'HEAD'.
>>>
>>> So now we can use 'git show @~1', and all that goody goodness.
>>>
>>> Until now '@' was a valid name, but it conflicts with this idea, so lets
>>
>> s/lets/let's/ (contraction of "let us")
>
> Ah, the contraction versus the first person singular. In this case
> where the context is concluding in decision, rather than making a
> statement ("Let's go to the shops", for example) then "lets" is the
> correct word to use here.
You've lost me. I think Eric is right. If "lets" is a verb in this
sentence, what is its subject?
Besides, of which verb & tense is "lets" the first person singular? Never
have I "lets" anything in my life... :)
M.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
