On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> So let's go ahead and apply these directly on top of 'master', once
>>> we hear from Emacs folks and they are happy with it. I'll queue it
>>> on 'pu' so that I do not have to go back to the list archive when it
>> I already heard that everything seems to be working correctly, except
>> one feature, the biggest change, which I screwed up with a one-liner
>> commit. That's why I added a test. Anyway, I've fixed it in my github
>> branch and in this patch series, and I've told them to try the fix.
> Let us know when they make progress on that front.
> If Emacs decides to switch to Git and decides to use this version of
> remote-bzr for their conversion, or at least a nontrivial group of
> developers favor to do so, without seeing concrete technical points
> that say remote-bzr is not yet ready (e.g. "the conversion is still
> wrong and X, Y and Z needs to be fixed"), that would be a very
> welcome solid vote of confidence in favor of us going ahead with
Seems unlikely for political reasons (isn't it always for GNU?), since
RMS is heavily involved in the decision.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html