Felipe Contreras wrote:
> If you are arguing in favor of arbitrary symbolic refs plus @{u} to
> work, a patch that allows that, and nothing else, should make sense.
> Such patch would trigger further discussion, for example, if
> get_branch() is the right place to achieve that.

What kind of absurd argument is this?  I am trying to solve the @ ->
HEAD problem correctly.  In the process, I fixed general symbolic-ref
handling and cleaned up the @-parsing logic.  Does anyone have a
problem with the fix, or am I missing something?

So, start the discussion.  What are you waiting for?

> I still see this in the code:
>
>         if (!name || !*name || !strcmp(name, "HEAD"))

Remove the !strcmp(name, "HEAD") and tell me what you see.  "HEAD"
will get resolved just like any other symbolic ref, via the hunk I
added.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to