On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <[email protected]> wrote:
> $ git symbolic-ref M refs/heads/master
> $ git show M@{u}
> $ git branch -u ram/master M
>
> This patch fixes branch_get() directly, making these work.
It's not a fix, it's implementing brand new functionality, and
changing old behaviors.
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -1463,13 +1463,30 @@ void set_ref_status_for_push(struct ref *remote_refs,
> int send_mirror,
>
> struct branch *branch_get(const char *name)
> {
> - struct branch *ret;
> + struct branch *ret = NULL;
> +
> + /* Setup */
I thought the preferred style for these kinds of comments was:
/* setup */
> + git_config(handle_config, NULL);
> + alias_all_urls();
>
> - read_config();
> if (!name || !*name || !strcmp(name, "HEAD"))
I still see "HEAD" there. Didn't you say your patch makes "HEAD" less
of a special ref? Why is it still here?
> - ret = current_branch;
> + name = "HEAD";
> else
> ret = make_branch(name, 0);
> +
> + if (!ret || !ret->remote_name) {
> + /* Is this a symbolic-ref like HEAD, pointing to a
> + * valid branch?
> + */
The style is:
/*
* This is the preferred style for multi-line
* comments in the Linux kernel source code.
* Please use it consistently.
*
* Description: A column of asterisks on the left side,
* with beginning and ending almost-blank lines.
*/
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
