New version - nothing much changed since v2.2, except the new test
set to illustrate and prove the changes. Not sure about the t6111
numbering - there wasn't space where I really wanted to put it.
And maybe it should be appended to one of the existing tests.

You will note that I'm floundering for the name for the commits I care
about in part 9. Currently at "priority", but that's horrible, not least
because it isn't an adjective. I think the word I really want is
"interesting", but that's already taken... "Relevant", "important"?

Junio C Hamano (1):
  t6012: update test for tweaked full-history traversal

Kevin Bracey (8):
  decorate.c: compact table when growing
  t6019: test file dropped in -s ours merge
  t6111: new TREESAME test set
  rev-list-options.txt: correct TREESAME for P
  revision.c: Make --full-history consider more merges
  simplify-merges: never remove all TREESAME parents
  simplify-merges: drop merge from irrelevant side branch
  revision.c: discount side branches when computing TREESAME

 Documentation/rev-list-options.txt |  38 +--
 decorate.c                         |   2 +-
 revision.c                         | 511 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 revision.h                         |   4 +-
 t/       |  31 ++-
 t/  |  29 ++-
 t/       | 180 +++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 723 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 t/


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to