Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 08:08:45AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > I'm also not sure why your claim "we don't care about blobs" is true, >> > because naively we would want future runs of fast-export to avoid having >> > to write out the whole blob content when mentioning the blob again. >> >> The existing documentation is fairly clear that marks for objects >> other than commits are not exported, and the import-marks codepath >> discards anything but commits, so there is no mechanism for the >> existing fast-export users to leave blob marks in the marks file for >> later runs of fast-export to take advantage of. The second >> invocation cannot refer to such a blob in the first place. > > OK. If the argument is "we do not write them, so do not bother reading > them back in", I think that is reasonable.
The way I read builtin/fast-export.c::import_marks() is that it is more like "we do not write them, and we do not read them back in either IN THE CURRENT CODE". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html