Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Especially I did not check if there are
>> still undesirable data loss behaviour in corner cases that people
>> were worried about in the discussion.
> Check the tests. What am I missing?
I didn't do a thorough check, but my earlier comments are taken into
account, I didn't see anything wrong and the tests in 7/7 are good.
>> Perhaps "rebase" can be taught to be more careful when checking
>> if local changes may overlap with the changes being replayed.
> Frankly, I don't know if it's worth the effort. It might be a nice
> theoretical exercise, but what tangible benefit do I get as the end
> user (now that I have rebase.autostash)? In fact, I'll probably be
> slowing down the interactive rebase noticeably by executing a
> diff-tree at every step. And for what?
One benefit would be to avoid triggering rebuild (and editor reload) by
keeping the timestamps intact. But I agree it's probably not worth the
effort (and definitely isn't in the scope of this series).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html