Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes:
> There's still a lot to think about.
Is there? I do not think "volatile" is particularly a good
description for this, but showing what is pushed as a concrete
branch name feels like a good improvement to me, at least in
I haven't picked them up, and I won't be picking them up today, as I
suspect this series may conflict with the pre-2.0 preparation and
2.0 transition patches and I may end up having to fix conflicts
unnecessarily (resolving is eventually needed before 2.0 happens,
but resolving them, or even having to worry about the possibility
that I may have to do so, do not have to steal time from me today).
> [3/3] is the big itch: [1/2] and [2/2] are just setup patches.
> Ramkumar Ramachandra (3):
> push: factor out the detached HEAD error message
> push: fail early with detached HEAD and current
> push: don't push the volatile HEAD with current
> builtin/push.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html