Am 5/29/2013 8:39, schrieb Martin von Zweigbergk:
> +# f
> +# /
> +# a---b---c---g---h
> +# \
> +# d---G---i
...
> +test_run_rebase () {
> + result=$1
> + shift
> + test_expect_$result "rebase $* --onto drops patches in onto" "
> + reset_rebase &&
> + git rebase $* --onto h f i &&
> + test_cmp_rev h HEAD~2 &&
> + test_linear_range 'd i' h..
Isn't this expectation wrong? The upstream of the rebased branch is f, and
it does not contain G. Hence, G should be replayed. Since h is the
reversal of g, the state at h is the same as at c, and applying G should
succeed (it is the same change as g). Therefore, I think the correct
expectation is:
test_linear_range 'd G i' h..
> + "
> +}
> +test_run_rebase failure ''
> +test_run_rebase failure -m
> +test_run_rebase failure -i
> +test_run_rebase failure -p
-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
