Alex Bennée <[email protected]> writes:
> I think you are right. I was brave (well I assumed the tags would come
> back from the upstream repo) and ran:
>
> git for-each-ref | grep "refs/tags" | grep "commit" | cut -d '/' -f 3
> | xargs git tag -d
So that deleted all unannotated tags pointing at commits, and then it
was fast. Curious.
> However I have some big commits it seems:
>
> 09:37 ajb@sloy/x86_64 [work.git] >(git for-each-ref | grep ' commit' |
> cut -d\ -f1 | xargs -n1 git cat-file commit) | wc -c
> 1147231984
How many unique entries are there in that list, i.e., what does
git for-each-ref | grep ' commit' | cut -d\ -f1 | sort -u | wc -l
say? Perhaps you can also find the biggest commit, e.g. like so:
git for-each-ref | grep ' commit' | cut -d\ -f1 |
while read sha; do git cat-file commit $sha | wc -c; done |
sort -n
However, if that turns out to be the culprit, it's not fixable
currently[1]. Having commits with insanely long messages is just, well,
insane.
[1] unless we do a major rework of the loading infrastructure, so that
we can teach it to load only the beginning of a commit as long as we are
only interested in parents and such
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
