On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras
>>> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, and last year we returned a different code. The world didn't
>> end, because nobody is checking for the specific code. But if you want
>> to retain complexity forever, suit yourselves.
> And that was changed for a reason, compared to this change "because I
> like it". I maintain my NAK (not that it matters) until you justify
> your change better than "nobody is using it".
Who said the reason was "because I like it"? You don't agree that
making the code simpler and more maintainable is a good reason for any
Anyway, if you care so much about the current behavior, why isn't
there any tests that check for this?
My patch passes *all* the tests.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html