On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras >>> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, and last year we returned a different code. The world didn't >> end, because nobody is checking for the specific code. But if you want >> to retain complexity forever, suit yourselves. > > And that was changed for a reason, compared to this change "because I > like it". I maintain my NAK (not that it matters) until you justify > your change better than "nobody is using it".
Who said the reason was "because I like it"? You don't agree that making the code simpler and more maintainable is a good reason for any change? Anyway, if you care so much about the current behavior, why isn't there any tests that check for this? My patch passes *all* the tests. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
