On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Duy and I have been working on this topic for some time now.  Here's a
> review candidate.

I'm still hung up one the detached HEAD thing. It's a bit quirky to
put in for-each-ref, but for-each-ref can't truly replace branch
--list until it can display detached HEAD. But I think we can finish
this part and get it in first. Should be useful for some people

> Duy is currently writing code to factor out -v[v] and adding --sort,
> --count to git-branch, but I'm having a lot of difficulty working with
> a series of this size.  I'm leaning towards getting this merged before
> tackling branch (who wants to review a 40-part series?).  Especially
> after [14/15] and [15/15], git for-each-ref should be usable in its
> own right.

Agreed (a bit of concern about 14 and 15/15, though). Signed-off-by:
me for the whole series.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to