On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Pretty much what it says on the tin.
>
> And a bit more, isn't it?
>
> The --keep-redundant-commits option implies the --allow-empty option
> and it was perfectly acceptable to give both.  By making sure that
> only at most one of -k-r-d, -a-e or -s-e is given, this forbids that
> usage.
>
> "It is implied so there is no *need* to give it redundantly" is
> different from "It is implied so you shouldn't give it redundantly".

Remove that line then.

> Like 7 and 8 that adds --quiet/--skip, don't we want this also for
> revert?

If we don't want --allow-empty in revert, we don't want --skip-empty
either. That is a separate patch.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to