Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Thomas Rast <tr...@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> +#TODO: make order consistent across all flavors of rebase
>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd e n o' ''
>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd e n o' -m
>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd n o e' -i
>> [45/45] would seem to imply that these tests fail as of this patch.  Is
>> that correct?
>> If so, please either squash that change or move the test further up
>> marked as 'failure'.
> I won't. The whole purpose of the last patch is to show these tests are fixed.
> Martin von Zweigbergk's patch series is independent of this one, I
> merely added it to show the above.

So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file?

Thomas Rast
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to