On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Antoine Pelisse <apeli...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> When any ignore blank option is used, there will be lines that
>>> actually has changes (hence should be shown with +/-) but we
>>> deliberately ignore their changes (hence, if they ever appear in the
>>> hunk, they do so as context lines prefixed with SP not +/-). When
>>> we do so, we show the lines from the postimage in the context.
>> Don't we actually use preimage (see below) ? I think using pre-image
>> allows the patch to be applicable to another tree (but ignoring the
>> space changes).
Answering to myself: OK, my package version of git is 126.96.36.199 while
the post-image is used since 1.7.10 or something. That explains my
> But the result of such patch application is not usually what you
> want to use. If we use postimage (which by the way was a deliberate
> design decision we made earlier), at least the review of the patch
> is easier because you would see the end result more clearly.
I've found the patch and discussion  about that switch from
pre-image to post-image, so I can understand the motives (and see that
you actually considered problems for applying such a patch). I always
felt confident that running "git send-email -w" would send a patch
(that can be applied) without the potential space errors/changes I
would have added.
I think it's unfortunate that Git does generate patches with git-diff
that can't be applied if any space option is used. I'm still not
really convinced by the pre-image to post-image change, and maybe I
would have made it a non-default option. What is done is done, but I'd
rather like not do the same here, if possible.
>> If we actually hide new blank lines that are in the context, it means
>> that we won't be able to apply a patch with 2 new blank lines in the 3
>> line context.
> Yes, but I do not think the point of --ignore-blank-lines is to
> produce a patch that can be applied in the first place. It is to
> allow easier eyeballing.
I think it can not be applied because it's *hard* for a computer to
actually find the correct location, and it may be equally hard for the
reader to evaluate the change with removed/different context.
>> Anyway, I'm starting to think that "show blank lines changes near
>> other changes" makes sense more and more sense.
I'm glad to see how convinced you are ;)
I will send my patch and see what makes more sense.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html