Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes:

> +* `current` - push the refspec "$HEAD".  HEAD is resolved early to a
> +  branch name (referred to as $HEAD).  In other words, push the
> +  current branch to update a branch with the same name on the pushing
> +  side.

I'd put it the other way around: the intuitive explanation first, and
the technical one after. For people not totally familiar with Git, the
first part does not make much sense (and when I learn a new tool, I
really don't like when the doc assumes I already know too much about

Also, this $HEAD Vs HEAD doesn't seem very clear to me. I don't have a
really good proposal for a better wording, but maybe replacing $HEAD
with $branch would make a bit more sense, as having $HEAD != HEAD is

> +* `simple` - in central workflows, behaves like `upstream`, except
> +  that it errors out unless branch.$HEAD.merge is equal to $HEAD.

I'd reverse the sentense too. In your wording, I get the feeling that
erroring out is the normal flow, and pushing is the exception

"... except that it errors out if branch.$HEAD.merge is not equal to
$HEAD." ?

> +  single command.  Dangerous, and inappropriate unless you are the
> +  only person updating your push destination.

Here also, I'd have said "Dangerous, and inappropriate if you are
not ...".

Matthieu Moy
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to