Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes: > On 06/20/2013 07:11 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Perhaps I am missing something from the previous discussions, but I >> am having trouble understanding the "main packed ref cache" part of >> the above. "main" as opposed to...? > > "main" as opposed to "submodule".
I see. > No, the scenario would be that a git process wants to change a reference > in a submodule directly, as opposed to starting another git process > within the submodule, as I believe is done now. Maybe it's too > far-fetched even to consider... Perhaps. But the "singleton lock because we only handle main packed ref cache" does not prevent us from doing so later, so I think v3 is OK. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
