On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:30:52AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> > OS X 10.8.4, apache 2.2.22
> Hrm. That's quite odd. The patch in its entirety looks like this:
> [...]
> So it should not be having any effect at all on apache 2.2, unless it
> somehow does not like the <IfVersion> tags.

Just to double-check, I ran all of the http tests in "next" (with my
series) successfully on apache 2.2.16. So the good news is I haven't
broken apache 2.2.x entirely. :)

I'm not sure if there is something different between 2.2.16 and 2.2.22,
or something with the particular build. Here's my -V output, in case it

    $ apache2 -V
    Server version: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian)
    Server built:   Mar  3 2013 12:12:28
    Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:24
    Server loaded:  APR 1.4.2, APR-Util 1.3.9
    Compiled using: APR 1.4.2, APR-Util 1.3.9
    Architecture:   64-bit
    Server MPM:     Worker
      threaded:     yes (fixed thread count)
        forked:     yes (variable process count)
    Server compiled with....
     -D APACHE_MPM_DIR="server/mpm/worker"
     -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled)
     -D HTTPD_ROOT="/etc/apache2"
     -D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/lib/apache2/suexec"
     -D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="/var/run/apache2.pid"
     -D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status"
     -D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log"
     -D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="mime.types"
     -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="apache2.conf"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to