Johan Herland wrote: > But then, does it make sense to > say that we will only ever have exactly _one_ push refspec in the > current context, and we should therefore replace the "static const > char **refspec;" string array with a single "static const char > *refspec;" string? That would make it obvious that there is no room > for ambiguity with overlapping refspecs.
Multiple refspecs can be specified on the command-line; set_refspecs() is responsible for calling add_refspec() multiple times for each refspec, and _that_ is the primary use of the "refspec" variable. The single add_refspec() invocation in the push.default switch is a special case that reuses the variable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
