Johan Herland wrote:
> But then, does it make sense to
> say that we will only ever have exactly _one_ push refspec in the
> current context, and we should therefore replace the "static const
> char **refspec;" string array with a single "static const char
> *refspec;" string? That would make it obvious that there is no room
> for ambiguity with overlapping refspecs.

Multiple refspecs can be specified on the command-line; set_refspecs()
is responsible for calling add_refspec() multiple times for each
refspec, and _that_ is the primary use of the "refspec" variable.  The
single add_refspec() invocation in the push.default switch is a
special case that reuses the variable.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to