Vicent Martí <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Thomas Rast <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Please document the RLW format here.
>
> Har har. I was going to comment on your review of the Ewah patchset,
> but might as well do it here: the only thing I know about Ewah bitmaps
> is that they work. And I know this because I did extensive fuzz
> testing of my C port. Unfortunately, the original Java code I ported
> from has 0 comments, so any documentation here would have to be
> reverse-engineered.
I think the below would be a reasonable documentation, to be appended
after your description of the EWAH format. Maybe Colby can correct me
if I got anything wrong. You can basically read this off from the
implementation of ewah_each_bit() and the helper functions it uses.
-- 8< --
The compressed bitmap is stored in a form of run-length encoding, as
follows. It consists of a concatenation of an arbitrary number of
chunks. Each chunk consists of one or more 64-bit words
H L_1 L_2 L_3 .... L_M
H is called RLW (run length word). It consists of (from lower to higher
order bits):
- 1 bit: the repeated bit B
- 32 bits: repetition count K (unsigned)
- 31 bits: literal word count M (unsigned)
The bitstream represented by the above chunk is then:
- K repetitions of B
- The bits stored in `L_1` through `L_M`. Within a word, bits at
lower order come earlier in the stream than those at higher
order.
The next word after `L_M` (if any) must again be a RLW, for the next
chunk. For efficient appending to the bitstream, the EWAH stores a
format to the last RLW in the stream.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
