Jens Lehmann <> writes:

> Am 28.06.2013 20:44, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Heiko Voigt <> writes:
>> ... 
>>> Hmm, but does it have a --depth option for revisions? Maybe we should
>>> call it --clone-depth or --rev-depth to make it clear? --depth and
>>> --max-depth would be completely orthogonal but the name does not allow
>>> to distinguish them properly.
>> I do not have a strong opinion either way, but as you suggest, it
>> might be a good idea to call this new option --clone-depth to be
>> more specific.
> No strong opinion here either, but I'm leaning towards "--depth"
> because on one hand we already have the "--reference" option which
> is passed on to the clone command (and not "--clone-reference")...

OK, then "--depth" it is.

The points in your review on the last version with "--depth" (which
I picked up and parked on 'pu') still need to be addressed, I think?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to