Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> writes: >> Or perhaps you were implicitly assuming that "--lockref" would >> automatically mean "I know I am rewinding, so as soon as I say >> --lockref, I mean --allow-no-ff", and I did not realize that. > > That's what I mean, sort of. Because of your 4 cases of a ref update, I > do not think that > >> 3. The update fast-forwards, but the ref to be updated is not at the >> expected place; or > > is important to consider. The point of --lockref is to avoid data loss, > but if the push is fast-forward, there is no data loss. > >> If that is the semantics you are proposing, then I think it makes >> sense to make "--force" the big red button that lets anything go.
I have a reroll that goes in that direction. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html