Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes:
>> +When `git pull` that does not explicitly specify what branch from
>> +which repository is to be integrated with your history on the
>> +command line, recent Git will refuse to work until you specify how
>> +that integration should happen, either with a command line option
>> +(`--merge` or `--rebase`) or a configuration variable (`pull.rebase`
>> +or `branch.<name>.rebase`, which is the same as `--merge`
>> +(`--rebase`) when set to `false` (`true`) respectively.
> This paragraph-long single sentence may be intimidating. Perhaps some
> simplification is possible:
> As a safety measure, bare `git pull` (without repository or
> branch) needs to be told how to integrate pulled changes with
> your history; either via `--merge` or `--rebase`. Also see
> configuration variables `pull.rebase` and `branch.<name>.rebase`
> in linkgit:git-config.
> I intentionally omitted the true/false explanation of the
> configuration variables since the user can follow the link and read
> about them. It also may make sense to drop mention of those variables
> altogether since they are already described (including link) in the
> description of --rebase.
> I also intentionally omitted "recent Git" since it's rather nebulous.
Looks much better than the original. I would further suggest
dropping the "As a safety measure, bare " at the beginning.
`git pull` (without repository or branch on the command line)
needs to be told how to integrate the changes with your
history via either `--merge` or `--rebase` (see configuration
variables `pull.rebase` and `branch.<name>.rebase` in
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html