On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Matthijs Kooijman <matth...@stdin.nl> wrote:
>> This is a testcase that checks for a problem where, during a specific
>> shallow fetch where the client does not have any commits that are a
>> successor of the new shallow root (i.e., the fetch creates a new
>> detached piece of history), the server would simply send over _all_
>> objects, instead of taking into account the objects already present in
>> the client.
> Thanks. This reminds me I should add a test case in the 4/6 to
> demonstrate the regression and let it verify again in 6/6 that the
> temporary regression is gone. Will reroll the series with your patch
> included.

No. It's too hard. The difference is what base a delta object use and
checking that might not be entirely reliable because the algorithm in
pack-objects might change some day.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to