Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>  sequencer.c | 5 +----
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
>> index 351548f..8ed9f98 100644
>> --- a/sequencer.c
>> +++ b/sequencer.c
>> @@ -466,10 +466,7 @@ static int allow_empty(struct replay_opts *opts, struct 
>> commit *commit)
>>         empty_commit = is_original_commit_empty(commit);
>>         if (empty_commit < 0)
>>                 return empty_commit;
>> -       if (!empty_commit)
>> -               return 0;
>> -       else
>> -               return 1;
>> +       return empty_commit ? 0 : 1;
>>  }
>
> Isn't it the other way around? Moreover, 'return !!empty_commit;'
> would be simpler.

Yeah, thanks for pointing out this grave stupidity. This seems to be
inconsequential as far as the tests are concerned: have to do some
major yak shaving.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to