On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:25:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hansen <rhan...@bbn.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is it worthwhile to poke a lawyer about this as a precaution?  (If so,
> > who?)  Or do we wait for a motivating event?
> I can poke the lawyer that was originally involved.

For what it's worth, there is an existing push to clarify the
licensing terms for the DCO [1].  Involved parties include Luis
Rodriguez, Richard Fontana, Bradley Kuhn, Mike Dolan, and Karen
Copenhaver.  Hopefully they'll have something to say after the New
Orleans LinuxCon.  The DCO licensing is not quite the same as changing
the DCO text, but they're probably closely related ;).


[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1397613/focus=1400065

This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to