Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> napisał:
>Yeah, it is easy to say that
>       git log -- A ':(exclude)A/B' A/B/C
>has two positive (A, A/B/C) and one negative (A/B), and then the
>most specific one A/B/C matches a path A/B/C/D and hence A/B/C/D is
>But to actually _design_ it, there are ambiguities that makes
>understanding and explaining the semantics, especially given
>pathspecs can have wildcards, icase matches, etc.  For example, is
>":(exclude,icase)A/B/?"  more specific than "A/?/C" or less?

 What about simply iterating over options in order in which they are specified 
and the last option that matches specifies the result? 

Piotr Krukowiecki 
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to