Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt <j...@sahnwaldt.de> writes: > Hi everyone, > > tl;dr: The short form "git checkout foo" is a mess. There's simply too > much "DWIM" magic going on. There are no comprehensible rules how it > decides if "foo" is a pathspec or a refspec.
There is a very simple rule: What's on the left hand side of -- are refs, what's on the right hand side are paths. When you don't use --, then Git tries to guess, and fails whenever there's an ambiguity. >> OK, what happens is that "git checkout wiktionary" is actually a >> shorthand for "git checkout -b wiktionary --track origin/wiktionary". > > No, it isn't. What I meant was that the short form advised by people were _meant_ to be a shorthand. > Let's consider several scenarios: I don't get your point. Is the overly long list a way of complaining? Are you suggesting a change? What do you think about the change I'm proposing? -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
