On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Matthieu Moy
> Ralf Thielow <ralf.thie...@gmail.com> writes:
>> recently I did a merge where a complete repo shall be
>> merged into a specific directory of another repo. I
>> tried both the "subtree" merge strategy and the option
>> "-Xsubtree=<dir>" of "recursive". I noticed that in both
>> cases somehow the history of single files were lost
>> during these merges (with history I mean 'git log <file>'
>> and 'git log --follow <file>').
> This is a known bug of "git log --follow": it does not follow accross
> subtree merge. But your history is still there (try gitk on your project
> for example).
> Technically, a subtree merge is a merge commit in which files are
> renamed compared to the second parent. --follow does not manage this
Thanks for explanation.
I knew the history of the repo is there, but the history of single files
(and the ability to look at it) is so important that subtree-merges aren't
an option for us. Such merges are rarely, luckily, but it would be nice
to get it work.
>> diff --git a/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh b/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
>> index 73fc240..e9a97d7 100755
>> --- a/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
>> +++ b/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
>> @@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ test_expect_success 'initial merge' '
>> test_cmp expected actual
>> +test_expect_failure 'file keeps history after subtree merge' '
>> + cd ../git-gui &&
>> + git log --follow git-gui.sh >../git/expected &&
>> + cd ../git &&
>> + git log --follow git-gui/git-gui.sh >actual &&
>> + test_cmp expected actual
> That would actually be good to add a failing test to "document" the
> Matthieu Moy
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html