Nicolas Vigier wrote:
> "the option is optional" was confusing as it is not the option but its
> argument which is optional.
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <bo...@mars-attacks.org>
> --- a/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt
> @@ -259,9 +259,10 @@ Each line of options has this format:
> - * Use `?` to mean that the option is optional (though its use is
> + * Use `?` if the option takes an optional argument (though its use is
> + discouraged).
This still seems confusing: the argument's use is discouraged?
Would something like the following make sense?
* Use `?` if [...]. This is used for historical options
that once took no argument and later gained an optional
argument. Use of this feature for new options is
Hope that helps,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html