Am 18.10.2013 02:42, schrieb Karsten Blees:
> Am 17.10.2013 23:07, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>>
>>> Karsten Blees <karsten.bl...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Am 16.10.2013 23:43, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>>>> * kb/fast-hashmap (2013-09-25) 6 commits
>>>>> - fixup! diffcore-rename.c: simplify finding exact renames
>>>>> - diffcore-rename.c: use new hash map implementation
>>>>> - diffcore-rename.c: simplify finding exact renames
>>>>> - diffcore-rename.c: move code around to prepare for the next patch
>>>>> - buitin/describe.c: use new hash map implementation
>>>>> - add a hashtable implementation that supports O(1) removal
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I posted a much more complete v3 [1], but somehow missed Jonathan's fixup!
>>>> commit.
>>>
>>> Thanks; I'll replace the above with v3 and squash the fix-up in.
>>
>> Interestingly, v3 applied on 'maint' and then merged to 'master'
>> seems to break t3600 and t7001 with a coredump.
>>
>> It would conflict with es/name-hash-no-trailing-slash-in-dirs that
>> has been cooking in 'next', too; the resolution might be trivial but
>> I didn't look too deeply into it.
>>
>
> I've pushed a rebased version to
> https://github.com/kblees/git/commits/kb/hashmap-v3-next
> (no changes yet except for Jonathan's fixup in #04 and merge resolution).
>
> The coredumps are caused by my patch #10, which free()s cache_entries when
> they are removed, in combination with submodule.c::stage_updated_gitmodules
> (5fee9952 "submodule.c: add .gitmodules staging helper functions"), which
> removes a cache_entry, then modifies and re-adds the (now) free()d memory.
>
> Can't we just use add_file_to_cache here (which replaces cache_entries by
> creating a copy)?
No objections from my side. Looks like we could also copy the
cache entry just before remove_cache_entry_at() and use that
copy afterwards, but your solution is so much shorter that I
would really like to use it (unless someone more cache-savvy
than me has any objections).
And by the way: this is the last use of remove_cache_entry_at(),
would it make sense to remove that define while at it? Only the
remove_index_entry_at() function it is defined to is currently
used.
> diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
> index 1905d75..e388487 100644
> --- a/submodule.c
> +++ b/submodule.c
> @@ -116,30 +116,7 @@ int remove_path_from_gitmodules(const char *path)
>
> void stage_updated_gitmodules(void)
> {
> - struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> - struct stat st;
> - int pos;
> - struct cache_entry *ce;
> - int namelen = strlen(".gitmodules");
> -
> - pos = cache_name_pos(".gitmodules", namelen);
> - if (pos < 0) {
> - warning(_("could not find .gitmodules in index"));
> - return;
> - }
> - ce = active_cache[pos];
> - ce->ce_flags = namelen;
> - if (strbuf_read_file(&buf, ".gitmodules", 0) < 0)
> - die(_("reading updated .gitmodules failed"));
> - if (lstat(".gitmodules", &st) < 0)
> - die_errno(_("unable to stat updated .gitmodules"));
> - fill_stat_cache_info(ce, &st);
> - ce->ce_mode = ce_mode_from_stat(ce, st.st_mode);
> - if (remove_cache_entry_at(pos) < 0)
> - die(_("unable to remove .gitmodules from index"));
> - if (write_sha1_file(buf.buf, buf.len, blob_type, ce->sha1))
> - die(_("adding updated .gitmodules failed"));
> - if (add_cache_entry(ce, ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD|ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_REPLACE))
> + if (add_file_to_cache(".gitmodules", 0))
> die(_("staging updated .gitmodules failed"));
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
