On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Karsten Blees <karsten.bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Could you post details about your test setup? Are you still using >>> WebKit for your tests? >> I'm on Win7 x64, Core i5 M560, WD 7200 Laptop HDD, NTSF, no virus >> scanner, truecrypt, no defragger. >> > > OK, so truecrypt and luafv may screw things up for you (according to my > measurements, luafv roughly doubles lstat times on C:). Aren't we disabling UAC / LUAFV on a per-executable basis using manifests? At least the blog article at [1] suggests that we are in fact doing it the right way using our script to genera the manifests [2]. Oh but wait, we're not generating a manifest for git.exe itself, only for executables that contain "setup", "install", "update", "patch" etc. So maybe having a manifest for git.exe, too, would improve performance? [1] http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alexcarp/archive/2009/06/25/the-deal-with-luafv-sys.aspx [2] https://github.com/msysgit/msysgit/blob/master/share/msysGit/make-manifests.sh -- Sebastian Schuberth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
