On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Matthieu Moy
<matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:

>> I'm not sure what you're trying to point me at. It's clear that from
>> an implementation view you need to blame HEAD^ if you need to know
>> which poeple should review your changes in HEAD.
> I agree that the situation when providing only HEAD is really
> disappointing...
>> But IMHO that is an implementation detail that should be hidden from
>> the user.
> ... but it's not just an implementation detail: git-contacts takes a
> range of commits, so you can ask for people to Cc for a whole patch
> series for example.
> If I understand correctly, "git contact $ONE_COMMIT" does
> "git contact $ONE_COMMIT..HEAD" implicitly, and this is weird when

It's not only weird if $ONE_COMMIT is HEAD, but for any single commit.
At least I would expect "git contacts $ONE_COMMIT" to list the poeple
interested in the single commit $ONE_COMMIT. Instead, what it seems to
do is list the people who are interested in the commits *after*

Sebastian Schuberth
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to